A Vote About Your Family’s Safety
This November, Arizona voters will see a question on the ballot that looks straightforward: Should the government be able to force medical procedures on you? Framed that way, the answer feels obvious—no.
But that isn’t the real decision you’re being asked to make. The ballot question is whether to write that protection into the Arizona Constitution—permanently, and in a way that covers not just you, but every public-health decision affecting every Arizonan, under conditions nobody can predict yet. That distinction matters.
Arizona’s legislature tried to pass this protection as a regular law. Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed related bills in 2025. When the legislature couldn’t get the policy through the ordinary process, it turned to a constitutional amendment — HCR 2056, officially titled “Medical Mandates; Right to Refuse.” Whatever you think of the policy, if voters approve it no future governor, legislature, or public-health emergency can change it. Another ballot measure would be required. The proposal includes exceptions, but they are narrow — criminal custody, emergency care when no one can consent, existing federal law. They do not cover school vaccination requirements or public health emergencies. In public health, where situations evolve quickly and information is often incomplete, that rigidity is a real danger.
Individual Choice vs. Protecting the Vulnerable
Consider three situations.
Arizona currently requires students to be vaccinated against certain diseases, with limited exemptions, to attend in-person classes. Under the proposal those laws would become unconstitutional. The child still has options—home study is well-established, and fully online schools have been available statewide since before the pandemic. The family faces a real choice, but the child does not lose access to education.
A hospital that requires staff vaccination would be barred from enforcing that rule. Employees could still work in offices, schools, retail, construction, or any setting that doesn’t involve daily contact with patients who cannot protect themselves. The restriction is limited to one category of jobs, not to employment altogether.
Government overreach, forced medical decisions, a parent’s right to choose — those concerns are real, and the people who hold them are correct that autonomy matters.
The third situation is different.
The Damage Isn’t Just to One Life
In early 2025, measles spread through a community of Mennonite families in Gaines County, Texas. Vaccination rates in some local schools fell to 46 percent — roughly half the 95 percent coverage needed to protect those who can’t be vaccinated themselves: newborns, the immunocompromised, children too young for the vaccine. The virus moved fast. An unvaccinated eight-year-old girl with no underlying health conditions was admitted to Covenant Children’s Hospital in Lubbock. Her lungs failed. She died. She was somebody’s child, grandchild, niece.
She was not the only child who died. By the time that outbreak was controlled, Texas had recorded 762 cases, with dozens of hospitalizations.
Public health officials responded — vaccines were deployed, schools excluded exposed unvaccinated students, tracing teams worked through the community. The tools existed and were used. The outbreak was brought under control.
Now imagine the same scenario with this proposal in place. Vaccination rates fall, the virus spreads, and possibly hundreds of children become infected. Some would be permanently disabled, and some would die. The health department couldn’t move to require vaccination for school attendance in the affected area. The Constitution has already decided, permanently, that parental autonomy wins. The children who end up in the hospital didn’t choose this. Their parents wanted to protect them, but had no way to do so.
The Permanent Layer
Measles isn’t the only disease that behaves this way, and 2025 isn’t the only year that matters. The proposal doesn’t target measles or any specific illness. It applies to whatever public-health situation Arizona faces in 2030, 2035, 2040 — or to threats that don’t have names yet. Public health must act before the full picture is clear, at population scale, against harms that haven’t yet occurred. A measles outbreak doesn’t pause for a ballot measure, and a novel pathogen won’t wait for legislation.
Democratic governance keeps most policy in the adjustable layer — laws and regulations that elected officials can modify as conditions change, that governors can veto, and that voters can overturn by electing different legislators. The Constitution forms the permanent layer, reserving protections such as free speech, due process, and equal protection from the sway of shifting majorities. Moving something from the adjustable layer to the permanent layer is a serious act. It means future Arizonans — facing circumstances current voters cannot foresee — lose the ability to choose a different path.
The eight-year-old girl in Lubbock had no voice in the vaccination choices of her community. When the virus surged and coverage slipped below the threshold that protects everyone, neither she nor her parents could protect her. A child’s death doesn’t stay inside one family. It moves through grandparents, siblings, classmates, neighbors. Communities carry that trauma long after the outbreak ends.
Democracy’s hardest job is balancing rights that genuinely conflict. Your autonomy matters. So does her life and health. The system we have now keeps that balance flexible. It does so imperfectly, through elected officials who answer to voters, adjusting as conditions change. The proposal removes that balance permanently, locking it in place regardless of what conditions demand. The Constitution you’re being asked to change doesn’t maintain that balance. It ends it.
To send your own message to Arizona Representatives, you can sign this Resistbot letter, or use it for ideas. Text SIGN PDROWD to 50409. The service is free, secure, and delivers messages directly to elected officials. The full sample letter is available at: https://resist.bot/petitions/PDROWD.
Resistbot has been used by millions to communicate with Congress and state legislatures since 2017.