In March 2026, the VA and the Department of Justice signed an agreement to put homeless veterans under permanent legal guardianship. They called it protection.
It isn’t.
In March 2026, the VA and the Department of Justice signed an agreement to put homeless veterans under permanent legal guardianship. They called it protection.
It isn’t.
Attack ads will say Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed 401 bills. The public record shows what those bills were, what the veto blocked, and it has cost Arizona taxpayers. Seventy of those vetoes were ordinary legislative friction, the kind that happens between any governor and any legislature regardless of party. The remaining 331 followed a pattern that is documented in the public record and consistent across three legislative sessions.
Arizona voters will hear that Katie Hobbs vetoed 401 bills. That number is real. The context behind it — the audit that cost taxpayers at least $8.6 million, the structural reasons Arizona was targeted, and the wealth extraction agenda those vetoes blocked — is the part the attack ads leave out.
Arizona voters will decide this November whether to permanently lock public health policy into the state constitution. HCR 2056, titled ‘Medical Mandates; Right to Refuse,’ sounds like a personal freedom measure. Before you vote, here is what the proposal actually does — and what it prevents.
ICE detention has been restructured into a large-scale system of wealth extraction. Government authority is used to move public money to private corporations, while enforcement practices determine who bears the human and economic costs. In this system, extraction politics—the use of governmental power, budgets, and enforcement authority—works in tandem with extractive capitalism, in which private firms convert public policy into guaranteed revenue.
Federal-private detention contracts exemplify wealth extraction—channeling public funds to profit-driven corporations. This analysis focuses on ICE detention contracts.
This local mechanism forms the third tier of a broader three-tiered extraction system: federal agency diversions, legislative reallocations from social programs, and city intermediaries via IGSAs.
In 2025, Congress appropriated $75 billion to ICE over four years—tripling the scale of this extraction system.
This post expands on a shorter version published on Substack: ICE Detention Contracts: Cities as Intermediaries for Private Profits.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries claims to be a champion against corporate influence in politics. Last month, he criticized Republicans for prioritizing “MAGA billionaire donors” over everyday Americans. This month he endorsed Democratic proposals to curb “corporate influence in our broken campaign finance system.”
Don’t buy into Chuck Schumer’s latest X post for a second—it’s pure, unadulterated bullshit. It’s a smokescreen meant to fool anyone who isn’t paying attention.
Political donation requests are constant. They arrive by email, text, social media, and direct mail. Almost all of them come with urgency: a critical moment, a final push, everything on the line.
Many of the people being asked to give are already stretched thin. Donating isn’t casual for these households. It means tradeoffs, on top of rising costs and tight budgets.
Frustration, hopelessness, anger, and disgust are common.
This response is sometimes called donor fatigue or messaging excess. It is fatiguing and excessive — not because people don’t care, but because it is driven by wealth extraction.
I was noticing some fundraisers when I realized this is just another example of wealth extraction — fundraising for expenses that should be covered by systems we already pay for.
Online fundraising has exploded as a replacement for public systems that collect funds but fail to deliver.
| Title | Price | Purpose | Condition | Build Date |
|---|